Pro Choice Virginia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
412051991
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
5719702536
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$361,588
Expenses
$137,091
Assets
$556,297
Liabilities
$783

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TARINA KEENE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TARINA KEENE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $98,271 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Repro rising Virginia is a bold, effective, and trusted leader in the political fight for reproductive freedom in Virginia. We advocate for laws and policies that guarantee the right to bodily autonomy, including access to abortion care without barriers. We elect pro-reproductive freedom candidates at the state and local levels, and we hold lawmakers accountable to the people of Virginia. Centered in racial and gender justice, we educate people in our communities, as well as policymakers, about the broad range of issues encompassing sexual and reproductive health and rights.

What it reported doing in 2024

Repro rising Virginia is a state-level, grassroots advocacy and political organization supported by thousands of members, volunteers, and activists throughout the commonwealth. Repro rising Virginia is building political power for pro-abortion virginians and working to ensure every virginian can make the personal reproductive decisions that are best for them and their family, without stigma or political interference. Repro rising Virginia accomplishes its goals through education, advocacy, organizing, and election work.educate - repro rising Virginia keeps Virginia's public, policymakers, and media informed on the state of reproductive rights and health care in the commonwealth and up-to-date on policy developments and news. (continued on schedule o)advocate - repro rising Virginia is the voice of pro-choice virginians with state and local policymakers, advocating in richmond and around Virginia to protect and advance access to abortion, birth control, sex education, and the full range of reproductive health care.organize - repro rising Virginia's network of grassroots activists and volunteers across Virginia take action to stand up for reproductive rights, educate their friends and neighbors, and make their voices heard with policymakers.elect - to change the balance for reproductive choice in Virginia, repro rising Virginia works to hold anti-choice politicians accountable and elect more lawmakers who share virginian's values. Repro rising Virginia identifies and supports strong pro-choice candidates for state office in Virginia and works to get out the pro-choice vote.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25.6%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 67.5%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.1%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.06; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 71.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25.6% of revenue deployed · 67.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.