Prison of Peace

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472834535
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Calabasas, CA, USA
Phone
8184455287
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Inmate Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$248,242
Expenses
$247,542
Assets
$1,222,827
Liabilities
$3,039

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • LAUREL KAUFER CEO (OFFICER): $57,736 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To reduce violence and promote peaceful conflict resolution among prison inmates.

What it reported doing in 2025

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the organization engaged in the following Significant Program Services activities: SKILLS PROGRAMS: All Prison of Peace skills programs are intense and highly interactive, engaging participants in discussions of theory and concept, teaching them new skills, and guiding them in the practice of engaging others in the application of the skills and processes taught.ORIENTATION CORRESPONDENCE COURSEThis course introduces prospective participants to selected concepts and skills of Prison of Peace. It comprises 8 modules, designed to be done one at a time, preferably on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. This gives participants time to think about the things theyve read and internalize them before moving on. Each module includes a Lesson (2 pages), at least one Reading (2 pages), and a worksheet of introspective questions (2 pages). Each Lesson provides background and information about the selected concept. Each Reading, written by one of our formerly incarcerated staff trainers, shares a personal perspective through their experiences related to using the concept that is the focus of the Lesson.Completing this course as a prerequisite to skills workshops greatly reduces the normal attrition experienced at the start of any new in-person program, saving the usually limited space for committed students.CIRCLE KEEPER WORKSHOPThis is the initial workshop in the Prison of Peace curriculum. It provides participants with an introduction to the theory/concepts of Restorative Justice, intensive skill building in the use of Active Listening, and the practice of Peace Circles as a tool for community building and a method for intervention in times of conflict. It provides the foundation for all other Prison of Peace Skills Workshops.PEACEMAKER I WORKSHOP Building on the skills learned in the Circle Keeper Workshop, this workshop provides participants with information and skills in planning, leading, and following up on Agreement Discussions with others so that they create durable Agreements. Participants are then provided skills to guide others into solving their own problems without providing opinions or advice.PEACEMAKER II WORKSHOP Building on the skills learned in the Peacemaker I Workshop, participants become more comfortable with the essential skills of problem-solving and work on understanding Emotions and their triggers to learn how to engage in the process of reprogramming trigger responses, allowing for responsive choices rather than reactive behaviors. MEDIATION SKILLS WORKSHOPThe Mediation Skills Workshop builds on the skills taught in our Circle Keeper and Peacemaker workshops. This skills workshop takes participants through a well-defined six-stage process in understanding and conducting mediation from beginning to end, using practical information and relevant, interactive scenarios that introduce participants to various potential outcomes at every step in the process. In addition, this workshop covers the various skills needed by mediators, including refreshers on the effective communication techniques learned in our prerequisite workshops, as well as discussions regarding the ethical conduct of mediators and explanations of interest-based conflict resolution designed to address the deep needs and injustices underlying conflict.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.94; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $172K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.