Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222327766
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Princeton, NJ, USA
Phone
6094970020
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Symphony Orchestras

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,801,679
Expenses
$4,330,875
Assets
$12,092,985
Liabilities
$1,031,787

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marc Uys (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Marc Uys (Executive Director): $242,297 total reported compensation
  • Rossen Milanov (Music Director): $143,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the princeton symphony orchestra is to leverage the power of live music to uplift the human experience.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education - activities included 68 classroom visits, a "listen-up" workshop, and 2 "schoolday" concerts. Pso's partnership with yocj continued, with in-person rehearsals with pso's assistant conductor. Pso musicians ran sectionals and masterclasses. These coachings were also offered to gpyo for the first time. Activities with the princeton festival included an instrument petting zoo and a series of opera workshops titled "music that tells a story" total live audience: 11,537. Princeton symphony orchestra (pso) has a dynamic impact on the lives and education of children, including underserved and disadvantaged youth. The acclaimed education program bravo! Is a mainstay of pso activities, reaching more than 10,000 students annually. Now in its 30th year, bravo!'s touring small-ensemble program establishes pso musicians in teaching partnerships at more than 30 public, private, and special-needs elementary schools throughout central New Jersey. Full-orchestra performances for elementary school students are held each spring. At the middle school level, bravo! Offers listen up!, a program which brings students to classical series concerts and invites them to create visual art in response to the music they hear. High school and college instrumentalists gain invaluable educational experiences through bravo! Masterclasses, taught by world-renowned artists. Since fy21, the pso has a partnership with the youth orchestra of central jersey (yocj) in which the pso's assistant conductor leads yocj's top ensemble, and pso musicians work closely with students as professional mentors. Mentorship by pso musicians was extended to students of the greater princeton youth orchestra (gpyo) for the first time in fy25. From kindergarten through college, bravo! Inspires the next generation of musicians and audiences. Pso soundtracks is a lecture series which offers insights about what goes into orchestrating a concert by a professional symphony. The series delves into diverse topics related to the music that the pso performs and what happens behind the scenes: everything from who chooses the music, to how individual musicians and sections shape the sound of the orchestra, to the stories behind the beautiful and often rare instruments owned and maintained by members of the pso. Lectures are held at the princeton public library, and are free and open to the public.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $242K · 27 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $289K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.