Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521746234
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Princeton, NJ, USA
Phone
6092191800
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,887,454
Expenses
$36,801,508
Assets
$279,610,078
Liabilities
$92,606,388

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA J LONGMAN (COO/CFO (interim CEO))
  • NELIDA VALENTIN (VICE PRESIDENT, GRANTS & PRGM)
  • Jeffrey Vega (President/CEO (Dec'd 1/28/24))

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURA J LONGMAN (COO/CFO (interim CEO)): $332,188 total reported compensation
  • MARCIA W SHACKELFORD (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFFICER): $248,862 total reported compensation
  • NELIDA VALENTIN (VICE PRESIDENT, GRANTS & PRGM): $229,026 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The community foundation promotes philanthropy to advance the well-being of our communities. The community foundation has several grantmaking initiatives in the areas of education, arts, basic human needs, capacity building, and more.

What it reported doing in 2024

The community foundation is an active grantmaker through several grant programs (including greater mercer grants and the fund for women & girls) and grantmaking from donor-advised, designated, nonprofit, and field-of-interest funds. The community foundation's strategic grantmaking program, all kids thrive, was designed to address high rates of chronic absenteeism in local public schools. In 2023, the first phase of the program concluded. We evaluated the program, celebrated its successes, and took steps to begin designing the next phase of the program to help continue to meet the needs of low-income students and their families. Community impact grants support nonprofits working to improve the quality of life for children, families and communities, including nonprofits focusing on food insecurity, mental health, economic development and arts education. We also support giving circles and field of interest funds to engage women and millennials in philanthropy. The community foundation also makes grants from donor-advised, designated, nonprofit and field of interest funds. Its primary focus is central New Jersey, but grants from donor-advised funds are made regionally and nationally as well. Competitive grants address the needs of low-income people in greater mercer county, provide operating support for nonprofits working with low-income people, and provide support for work to build the social capital of the region. In 2015 the board defined social capital as building communities. The community foundation's grantmaking touches many programmatic areas including education, basic services, health, arts & culture, housing, the environment, historic preservation, and animal welfare. Promoting philanthropy and providing education: the community foundation actively engages its donors, grantees, and the professional advisors in the region to encourage charitable giving broadly, and to build over time a community-wide commitment to philanthropy. It sponsors seminars and workshops on topics such as endowment-building, good governance, grant-seeking best practices, risk management, and planned giving. The community foundation positions itself as a resource to the region and regularly responds to requests for information and guidance. The community foundation partners with other organizations such as the council of nj grantmakers, the gift planning council of New Jersey, nj center for nonprofits, and the support center partnership in philanthropy to expand its educational offerings. Outside non-profit groups conduct related workshops on its premises. Staff are available to consult with donors, nonprofits, professional advisors, and community leaders on issues related to gifts, grants, partnerships and collaborations, and effective philanthropy and nonprofit management. It shares its expertise widely as it works to meet its mission to "promote philanthropy to advance the well-being of our communities forever." the community foundation includes many scholarship funds. It grants scholarships and awards through competitive processes to support college study and to honor achievement in the arts, music, and community service. The community foundation's liabilities to assets ratio increases as the community foundation's portfolio of non-profit funds increase. As part of its mission, the community foundation assists local non-profit organizations invest their money. This relationship with local non-profit fundholders is important to our mission and shows as a liability on our financial statements.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 96.4%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -76.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.6; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $332K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $139K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 522 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 515 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.