Princeton Amateur Wrestling Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272612616
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Hamilton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6096892399
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,984
- Expenses
- $159,594
- Assets
- $7,401
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN BOVE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN BOVE (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT SCHMIDT (SECRETARY)
- MICHELLE EVERMAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The princeton amateur wrestling society (paws) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with the mission of providing wrestling opportunities for athletes of all levels to enhance their skills throughout the year. The coaching staff will use wrestling as a vehicle to teach our student athletes how to strive for success in all aspects of life, developing their character, confidence, discipline, work ethic, and mental toughness.
What it reported doing in 2016
The princeton amateur wrestling society (paws) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with the mission of providing wrestling opportunities for athletes of all levels to enhance their skills throughout the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.