Princes of Peace Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331165373
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Deming, NM, USA
Phone
3602892606
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Peace and Security

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10
Expenses
$10
Assets
$206
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Jay Prince (Chairman)
  • Jay Prince (Secretary)
  • Michelle Dexter-Prince (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Assist in Creating Personal/World Peace.

What it reported doing in 2017

Education, General/Other: Our current project is creating a Community Cyber Newspaper consisting only of good news about the Grays Harbor Washington area. Work began on the website in November 2008. Major development and site design occurred through February 2009. The site was launched on February 9, 2009 as The Community Cyber News (TheCommunityCyberNews.com). The project has been a mixed success with over 50 contributors and almost a thousand postings since its start in 2009. We are unsure how many people we have had an impact on. However, we are not able to hand the project off to others as we had hoped and the number of contributors has dwindled with ourselves doing most of the work. We moved the Foundation to Silver City, New Mexico for a new start in June, 2010. We had planned to terminate the site at the end of August, 2010. Instead we have continued to maintain the site daily to maintain our positive search status. In spite of the limited success in Grays Harbor, we feel we have learned much from the experience and have a mature site to use in the future with little or no development allowing for a quick start. We are continuing to look for a new location receptive to this idea.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.6; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.