Prince of Peace Senior Apts Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411767063
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Hutchinson, MN, USA
Phone
3202347588
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$795,867
Expenses
$723,161
Assets
$5,229,317
Liabilities
$3,018,596

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DESTINI DORING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DESTINI DORING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $58,550 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide independent senior housing designed to create a dignified lifesyle within a senior community. Provide conveniences and services that enhance the quality of life and social involvement of each community member.

What it reported doing in 2025

Prince of peace senior living is a non-profit organization committed to providing senior christian housing at market rate. This year poprl finished with 99% occupancy with 25 people on the waiting list. Poprl continues to keep up with building maintenance and keeping our mission sustainable. We do our best to utilize volunteers in all areas to help keep costs down. In 2025, we utilized 69 volunteers who put in 1,699 hours for our mission. From meal volunteers to educational speakers, we are blessed with the best.along with myself, poprl employs 8 individuals. One maintenance person, one residentservices staff, one weekday lead cook, and four housekeeping/kitchen staff.the kitchen/housekeeping staff continued with additional housekeeping practices to keep areassanitary and safe. The resident services specialist has an ever-changing activity list. Some ofour resident's favorite brain activities include coffee & conversation, our intergenerationalprogram (usually students from park elementary or immanuel lutheran school), and ourmultiple card game groups.for physical health we offer different evidence-based exercise programs monday throughfriday including range of motion, arthritis prevention, and chair yoga. We also offer anaging adults and parents meeting quarterly offering free education on different topics fromfraud/scam prevention to veteran's benefits. We've built a great relationship with lutheransocial services having them come in to lead a redefining balance support group that discussesthe challenges of aging. Lastly, we were able to build raised garden beds with some donationsof materials, volunteer assistance, and utilized very little of our unrestricted donations tocomplete the project. Residents are welcome to assist and enjoy the produce from the gardens.our affordable meal program has remained the same being offered 5 days a week, monday thrufriday, holidays included. Our noon meal includes full entre, milk, juice, coffee, water, anddessert for only six dollars and holiday meals for nine dollars. We have been able to serve all of our meals in the dining room only delivering to those who are ill. The "sweet shoppe" thatoffers breakfast items at a nominal fee (ala carte) is open monday thru friday and is a chargeonly option to prevent any handling of cash. Other services ala carte did not see an increase.our free blood pressure checks have continued due to a few retired nurses volunteering tocome in weekly to offer this. Residents who need health services contract separatelythrough whichever home health care service, they choose and set up on their own. Ourresidents who need health services contract separately through whichever home health careservice they choose and set up on their own.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.23; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $650K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $59K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.