Prince Hall Legacy of Alabama

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200216856
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
Phone
2053289078
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Centers, Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,784
Expenses
$45,874
Assets
$61,355
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Greg Clark (President)
  • Richard Mathis (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Michael Ryan (Director)
  • Greg Clark (President)
  • Corey D Hawkins (Ex-Officio)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A To promote the health education and welfare of the citizens of Alabama particularly in communities which have a high percentage of culturally or economically disadvantaged residents or large minority population or which otherwise have been under-served in these areas; b To assist and facilitate the development of educational and health facilities in Alabama; c To sponsor health fairs seminars outreaches and similar events to educate the public on health issues and to encourage good health habits and practices; d To provide educational scholarships to worthy individuals;

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided scholarship assistance to students throughout the State of Alabama wishing to attend colleges and universities

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 60% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 53
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 95.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 39 of 41 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.