Prince Georges Leadership Action Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814287227
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Lanham, MD, USA
Phone
2407052925
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,994
Expenses
$138,124
Assets
$8,775
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • VICTOR KIRK (TREASURER)
  • CARLA CRUTCHFIELD (SECRETARY)
  • COLEMAN MILLING (LEAD SENIOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Prince george's leadership action network (pglan)is formed to address the immediate and long-term issues that threaten the health, well-being, and prosperity of families, religious institutions, conference centers and neighborhoods of prince george's county, Maryland; through relationship building and the identification and training of grass-roots leaders to address community concerns. Plan is a broad-based, multi-racial, multi- faith, multi-cultural grassroots power organization that aims to support clergy and lay leaders to address issues putting pressure on their families and communities. Plan aims to create an organization capable of addressing both the immediate and long-range issues that threaten these families, religious institutions, the commercial centers and communities of prince george's county. This purpose is accomplished through disciplined organized action which is non-violent and politically non-partisan.

What it reported doing in 2025

Plan approached the housing challenge in 2022. Through analysis, we identified the crisis in affordable housing that worsens by the day and that has been well documented by the university of Maryland and other observers. We conducted initial set of house meetings, the lack of affordable ownership and rental housing emerged as the number one concern of those engaged in those sessions. We are curently working in the area of voter awareness and voting rights. We are also working in the area of immigration awareness and rights. Wes moore, governor of Maryland, committed to work with plan and our sister organization b.u.i.l.d. To bring affordable housing to prince george's and baltimore counties. The project is ongoing and gaining momentum. Working with john hopkins hospital to establish urgent care facilities in the county

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.3%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 44.4%; rating input score 44
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.3% of revenue deployed · 44.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.