Prince Georges Heritage Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521120218
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bladensburg, MD, USA
Phone
3014520708
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,939
Expenses
$12,126
Assets
$230,608
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Douglas McElrath (Chairman)
  • C Michael Arnold (Vice Chair)
  • Pamela K Cooper (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Preservation of history and heritage in Prince George's County Maryland with a focus on bricks and mortar projects. Restoration of historic Magruder House, a colonial house built in 1742. Prince George's Heritage works on preserving the heritage of the County and on education of history and events that took place in the founding of our county and country.

What it reported doing in 2024

Prince George's Heritage has been working on preservation and protection of historic sites in Prince George's County Prince George's Heritage is working to protect historic structures, including a 1830's barn and slave house and various other historic structures on property owned by the State of Maryland. These structures may be the oldest standing structures of their kind in Maryland. All of Prince George's County Maryland and the citizens of the State of Maryland benefit from our work.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.02; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.