Prince George County Regional Heritage Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542058860
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Prince George, VA, USA
Phone
8048630212
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Reported finances

Revenue
$-3,155
Expenses
$24,541
Assets
$421,881

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lillian King-Boyd (Past President)
  • Judy Hamby (President)

People named in this filing

  • Lillian King-Boyd (Past President)
  • Randy Watkins (Historian)
  • Carol Bowman (Executive Direc)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations primary exempt purposes are education and the continual development and operation of a museum dedicated to preserving and presenting the history and heritage or Prince George County, Virginia.

What it reported doing in 2018

The Virginia Czech and Slovak Folklife Festival in partnership with the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities drew a record crowd in October 2016. The Festival-goers enjoyed the presentations of various aspects of the culture: authentic foods, dance, music, agricultural displays, and special performances by the Washington DC Sokol childrens dance troupe. The exhibit that is a permanent part of the Centers galleries was enhanced to show two maps: one depicting a detailed map of origin for those settling in Prince George/Dinwiddie from Bohemia; the second a map of the Centers service area showing original settlers and their farm locations. Photographs scanned from local family albums were enlarged and added to the permanent exhibit. As a pre-Festival event, the Center hosted the Cultural Attach to the Czech Embassy who spoke to overflow crowds.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -877.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.19; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.