Pride Orthopaedics Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874041056
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,169
Expenses
$108,251
Assets
$74,400

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Ashley Rogerson (Membership Committee Chair)
  • Ezra Goodrich (Communications Committee Chair)
  • Sarah Ballatori (Education Committee Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pride Orthopaedics is a collective of leaders and proactive lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ-plus) individuals and their allies with a mission to provide mentorship, and sense of belonging for members of the LGBTQplus orthopaedic community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Pride Ortho will hold two medical student workshops per year at host institutions. This program is call the Pride Ortho Medical Student Initiative (POMSI) and features networking with our board members, a question and answer panel, and several hands on stations where students can practice suturing, casting, and performing intramedullary nail and external fixation simulation on Saw Bones. This program is geared toward junior medical students to expose them to the field of orthopaedics as well as senior medical students who are applying for residency who would benefit from the networking opportunity. Several residents from the host institution will also participate and teach the students as well.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.3%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 59.5%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 49.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.3% of revenue deployed · 59.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $64K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.