Pride Day Equality Project Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931191034
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Eugene, OR, USA
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,444
Expenses
$19,600
Assets
$52,637

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brooks McLain (Co-President)
  • Nick Gajewski-West (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Brooks McLain (Co-President)
  • Nick Gajewski-West (Vice President)
  • Helen Shepard (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Mission of PRIDE is Promoting Respect In Diverse Expression P.R.I.D.E. for Arts and Culture in Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & Queer communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Eugene Pride Festival: one of the largest LGBTQ annual events in the state of Oregon. The festival features three stages a youth zone over 200 vendors and exhibitors a beer garden clothing swap workshops community art projects and more. The goal of PRIDE is to offer a platform to highlight performers entertainers musicians comedians and other artists in Eugenes and Oregons LGBTQ community to raise money for LGBTQ youth scholarships to fundraise for other area nonprofits that support our local LGBTQ community to strengthen community bonds within the community and our allies and to provide a platform for the expression of queer joy and celebration of all that makes our community unique.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.69; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 58.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $138K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.