Prevent Alzheimers Disease 2020 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270425749
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Potomac, MD, USA
Phone
3013096730
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alzheimer's Disease Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$442,190
Expenses
$425,745
Assets
$17,659
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZAVEN KHACHATURIAN (CHAIR PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ZAVEN KHACHATURIAN (CHAIR PRESIDENT)
  • ARA KHACHATURIAN (EVP TREASURER)
  • PETER SNYDER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

PAD2020 was created to rally national support and focus on increasing research and knowledge to prevent Alzheimers disease and other neurodegenerative diseases that affect the memory movement or mood of individuals.

What it reported doing in 2024

Alzheimers disease poses a significant burden on a global scale which has led to an enormous investment in research to find a cure. However despite these efforts there are very few medications available for people with dementia. The search for new interventions for Alzheimers disease is challenging because the exact relationship between the symptoms of the disease and its neurobiology is not yet fully understood. The diseases heterogeneity complex biological and environmental interactions multiple nonlinear timescales and a lack of modeling systems to integrate complex relationships further complicate this effort. To address these challenges the Calcium System Theory of Alzheimers Disease CAST-AD workgroup aims to design a unified systems theory. The group aims to create new foundational models to study protein dynamics and aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases. These models will be trained using supercomputing and hybrid super- and quantum-computing to simulate large data sets of proteins. The project will establish and validate foundational models using proteins such as bioluminescent enzymes to provide an easy functional readout. The group will then apply these models to crucial proteins and peptides involved in neurodegenerative diseases.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.5%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.7%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.5% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $316K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 40 current checks pass · 6 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ConferencesMeetings column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesAccounting column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesLegal column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesOther column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX Insurance column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.