Prevail Inc of Hamilton County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351681864
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Noblesville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3177736942
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,544,572
- Expenses
- $1,542,035
- Assets
- $1,197,163
- Liabilities
- $510,565
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAMI WANNINGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DEBBIE JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- DAVID WILLIAMSON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- BOB DUNLAP (FOUNDATION PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TAMI WANNINGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $101,439 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Prevail strives to empower victims of crime and abuse on their path to healing, while engaging the community to support safe, healthy relationships.
What it reported doing in 2024
Prevail, inc. Is an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, founded in 1986, dedicated to providing critical, lifesaving support to survivors of crime and abuse in hamilton county, Indiana, and neighboring communities. As hamilton county's designated rape crisis center and domestic violence service provider, we serve individuals ages 6 and up who have been directly or indirectly affected by crime and abuse. Our mission is to empower survivors on their path to healing while engaging the broader community to promote safe, healthy relationships and prevent violence.prevail operates with a committed 16-member board of directors, 18 staff members, and 81 volunteers. We work in collaboration with over 100 local government agencies, nonprofits, healthcare providers, and schools to provide comprehensive services. Our key programs include:- 24/7 crisis line offering immediate support to individuals in crisis- emotional support and personal advocacy ensuring survivors have the resources, tools, and assistance to navigate the aftermath of crime and abuse- peer support groups for survivors to connect with others who share similar experiences- legal advocacy and accompaniment supporting survivors in court and during legal processes- self-sufficiency services to help survivors gain independence, including financial literacy and employment readiness- housing support for survivors needing safe, stable housing through emergency shelter, rental assistance, and permanent housing solutionswe are also deeply committed to prevention efforts. Through educational programs, we address the root causes of violence by promoting healthy relationship dynamics and working to prevent first-time incidents of violence.impact and reachin the past year, prevail served 3,228 survivors of crime and abuse. Our educational initiatives reached an additional 8,000 students in hamilton county (grades 7-12) through healthy relationship education programs, and we extended our outreach to more than 88 community events and speaking engagements. Our organization actively participates in 23 state and local collaboratives aimed at increasing survivor safety and reducing violence across our service area.prevail's services consistently demonstrate positive outcomes for survivors:- 100% of survivors reported gaining new ways to plan for their safety- 100% felt better equipped to handle overwhelming emotions after working with an advocate- 97% learned about community resources they were previously unaware of- 93% gained knowledge about their role in the court process- 96% learned steps to achieve employment goals- 96% of students educated on healthy relationships reported understanding their role in violence preventionprevail remains committed to enhancing our capacity to serve survivors, increase community awareness, and engage in prevention efforts that build safer, healthier communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.