Prevail Ca

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942341360
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Stockton, CA, USA
Phone
2099412611
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Womens' Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,721,184
Expenses
$6,630,866
Assets
$3,803,041
Liabilities
$731,082

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDSAY METZINGER (PRESIDENT)
  • LIZETH GRANADOS (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
  • KRISTA FISER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (THRU 05/25))
  • STEPHANIE PLAYER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (EFF 05/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • KRISTA FISER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (THRU 05/25)): $162,157 total reported compensation
  • STEPHANIE PLAYER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (EFF 05/25)): $107,589 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide safety, compassion, and respect as we educate, empower, and advocate for individuals, families, and young people.

What it reported doing in 2024

North county (lodi satellite office) offers support services to victims and families affected by domestic violence and sexual assault in lodi and the northern part of the county. It also provides community education on these issues to local residents.serenity house, tracy shelter: serenity house offers temporary emergency accommodation for south county individuals affected by domestic violence, including women, men, and their children. Individuals may reside for up to 60 days and participate in supportive programs such as life skills training, support groups, individual counseling, referral services, and employment readiness initiatives.dawn house, stockton shelter: dawn house offers temporary emergency accommodation for individuals affected by domestic violence, including women, men, and their children. Individuals may reside for up to 60 days and participate in supportive programs such as life skills training, support groups, individual counseling, referral services, and employment readiness initiatives.safety net program (formerly focus): this program delivers case management and support services to families to address factors associated with child abuse and neglect, aiming to prevent further involvement with child protective services (cps). The program also assists families currently engaged with cps whose children are returning home or transitioning back. Through comprehensive case management and targeted interventions, the program supports family reunification and works proactively prior to cps involvement to mitigate risk factors.csec program: this program offers crisis intervention and ongoing support for individuals and families affected by sex trafficking or sexual exploitation. Services include peer counseling, case management, emergency shelter, advocacy, and support groups, and are available to male and female victims of all ages as well as their loved ones. The program also provides prevention education in san joaquin county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.7%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $77.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.