Prevail
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932882084
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Ogden, UT, USA
- Phone
- 0000000000
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,845
- Expenses
- $68,462
- Assets
- $10,383
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Courtney Pollock (Cofounder Vice Chair Treasurer)
- Christopher Garrett (Cofounder Chairman)
- Amanda King (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Prevail provides humanitarian aid and medical support in conflict zones with a primary focus on Ukraine Our work includes mine risk education training and awareness emergency medical care casualty stabilization and evacuation We operate exclusively for charitable and educational purposes serving civilians and at-risk populations affected by armed conflict
What it reported doing in 2024
Prevail operates exclusively in Ukraine providing humanitarian and medical services in conflict-affected regions Our primary programs in 2024 focused on mine risk education frontline medical support casualty stabilization and evacuation Throughout the year Prevail conducted over 100 mine risk education sessions targeting civilians aid workers and local responders These sessions were designed to reduce injuries and fatalities caused by unexploded ordnance and landminesan ongoing and severe threat across both active and recently liberated areas of Ukraine Our medical teams provided point-of-injury care trauma stabilization and safe evacuation for individuals wounded in conflict zones In 2024 Prevail treated and transported over 500 patients many of whom were in remote or severely under-resourced locations We also trained local medics and responders in trauma care contributing to long-term community capacity and resilience Donations directly supported the operation of our ambulances covered housing food and travel needs for volunteers funded vehicle maintenance mine risk awareness posters and fuel and allowed us to remain agile and present in high-risk environments Every dollar was used to support life-saving interventions and sustain our field operations Prevail operates with a lean core team and collaborates closely with Ukrainian partners and other NGOs Despite logistical and security challenges we maintained a consistent presence in high-need areas prioritizing rapid response sustainability and the protection of civilian lives All activities are conducted exclusively for charitable and educational purposes in alignment with our 501c3 mission
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.