Pretrial Justice Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521078400
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
6672819141
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,481,632
Expenses
$2,392,266
Assets
$1,386,985
Liabilities
$932,901

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GUISELA MARROQUIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KEVIN BECKFORD (SENIOR ASSOCIATE): $138,127 total reported compensation
  • MEGHAN GUEVARA (EXECUTIVE PARTNER (THRU AUGUST)): $120,649 total reported compensation
  • JESSICA BIZIK (SENIOR ASSOCIATE (THRU JULY)): $111,353 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pretrial justice institute informs, inspires, and mobilizes local pretrial changemakers working to end mass incarceration.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pretrial justice institute (pji) is one partner in the pretrial justice movement, which includes organizers, advocates, researchers, public officials, technical assistance providers, and countless others working nationally and locally on an array of reforms, from incremental improvements to radical reimagination.our role in this ecosystem is to partner with community and system stakeholders to translate community members' vision for safety, fairness, and equity into tangible pretrial policies and practicesand help them build the capacity and momentum to implement them.we do this by listening to (and learning from) the people closest to the problemand leveraging our nearly 50-year history of working within pretrial processes; our technical knowledge of pretrial law, research and best practices; and our unwavering commitment to racial justice.pji's new framework for change is local antiracist pretrial justicewhere community members and public officials partner to implement decarceral solutions rooted in equity, safety and well-being for all.to foster equity, safety, and well-being in our communities, we need a seismic shift in our nation's approach to pretrial justice: one that explicitly names and addresses the systemic deprivations that lead to incarcerationand demands relief from racial oppression and correctional control, both in jails and community settings.local antiracist pretrial justice (lapj) aims to do just that.lapj is a holistic framework that addresses the spectrum of pretrial decision points, starting with a person's contact with law enforcementor being able to avoid contactthrough the disposition of their case. Our vision for lapj is a pretrial process that honors the constitutional rights of people facing charges, with the vast majority remaining in the community with access to community-based services and very limited court-imposed restrictions.by reducing the likelihood that a person comes under correctional control at the "front door" of the system, we decrease the odds of future stays in jail or prisonultimately freeing up resources that can be invested in our communities.to that end (or, really, beginning), pji partners with community and system stakeholders to develop courageous, innovative solutions that are grounded in the wisdom of people with lived experienceincluding crime survivorsand oriented toward justice for black, brown and other marginalized communities.we believe that's not only the future of pretrial justiceit's a pathway to our collective freedom.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $69.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $199K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.