Presidents Council State Universities of Michigan
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352183753
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lansing, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5174821563
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,044,007
- Expenses
- $1,023,466
- Assets
- $390,267
- Liabilities
- $3,664
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL HURLEY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL HURLEY (CEO): $345,851 total reported compensation
- MIA MURPHY (DIRECTOR OF UNIV. RELATIONS): $149,497 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary mission of the presidents council is to advocate higher education as a public good and to promote its collective value in serving the public interest and the state of Michigan. The primary goal is to provide services to members by promoting Michigan's public university system; providing forums to collect, present, and discuss topics of collective concern; performing outreach services to k-12 programs; acting as liaison between members and government; advocating legislation, regulations and other policies that preserve and advance the rights, powers, and interest of Michigan's public universities; and by initiating activities, programs, or partnerships which support the interests of the public universities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Promote Michigan's public universities by providing a forum for discussion of items of collective concern; collecting information to prepare reports for presentation to the public; raising policymakers' awareness of the importance of Michigan's public universities; and advocating policies, legislation and regulations that preserve and advance the rights, powers, and interests of Michigan's public universities. 15 Michigan public universities and their students were served.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $346K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.