Preservation New Jersey Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222344109
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- West Trenton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6095830881
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,797
- Expenses
- $97,456
- Assets
- $60,581
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Paul Muir (President)
- Mark Nonestied (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Frank Banisch (Trustee)
- James Pittman (Trustee)
- Dale Perry (Business Mgr.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preservation New Jersey promotes the economic vitality, sustainability, and heritage of New Jerseys diverse communities through advocacy and education about historic preservation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Programs include advocacy for sound policy on behalf of the historic preservation community, including adaptive re-use and sustainable resource programs, conducting lectures, tours and workshops to educate the public, providing technical assistance through its board and employees as well as promoting cooperation among resources, and provides stewardship through 10 Most Endangered Places and easement services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.5%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 40.9%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.5% of revenue deployed · 40.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.