Presentation School Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141910759
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Brighton, MA, USA
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,030,959
- Expenses
- $1,182,555
- Assets
- $4,541,442
- Liabilities
- $3,993,925
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas OBrien (President - Chair)
- Sheila Quinn (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Clodagh Drummey (Exeuctive Director): $94,000 total reported compensation
- Martin Gredinger (Chief Financial Officer): $36,900 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Presentation School Foundation (PSF) enhances a vibrant communitythrough enriching social, educational, & cultural opportunities for families & individuals of all ages in the Allston-Brighton neighborhood of Boston.
What it reported doing in 2025
PSF Community Center is an anchor institution in Allston Brighton, offering a central access point to a range of critical services to the most vulnerable members of the community-particularly low-income families and recent immigrants. PSF Community Center is home to: -A food pantry, employment, tax and fuel assistance programs for low income residents; -A diaper pantry, playgroups for babies, toddlers and preschoolers, and parenting resources; -Food access initiatives for low income residents; and -An early education and child care center.--two community rooms, which are available for free use by nonprofits, serving more than 35 groups annually. PSF Community Center organizes a variety of community services including food, clothing, school supply, holiday gift drives, flu and COVID-19 vaccine clinics. In a diverse neighborhood where many nonprofits have been displaced because of escalating rents and development, PSF Community Center is widely regarded as a critical resource.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.84; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.1% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $991K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.