Present Age Ministries
Legal name: Present Age Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451728287
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Harrisburg, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7049539236
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $989,816
- Expenses
- $1,071,546
- Assets
- $317,803
- Liabilities
- $151,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HANNAH ARROWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- HANNAH ARROWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $89,973 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To journey with teenage girls who have survived being sexually abused, exploited or trafficked by providing a safe and loving environment where they can restore hope, rebuild trust and redefine love. Present Age Ministries is a 501(c) 3 nonprofit organization committed to combating the sexual abuse, exploitation, and trafficking of teen girls. We equip communities to identify at-risk teen girls through prevention and awareness education and to support survivors through holistic, individualized care. At Present Age Ministries, our Board of Directors provides wisdom, oversight, and guidance that ensure we remain faithful to our mission of combating exploitation and restoring hope. Each board member brings a unique blend of professional expertise, community leadership, and personal commitment to protecting and empowering vulnerable youth and families. Together, this dedicated team helps...
What it reported doing in 2024
Prevention - discovering your value learning system - our model offers a two-pronged approach that offers straight forward, culturally relevant information to youth to prevent and reduce victimization. It is an interactive learning system developed to address the cultural devaluation of women and to provide intentional prevention and early intervention to at-risk female adolescents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $887K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.