Prescott Antique Auto Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237288886
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Prescott, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9284455016
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,882
- Expenses
- $31,804
- Assets
- $214,239
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOM HOLDEN (PRESIDENT)
- CLARK MOSKOP (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TOM HOLDEN (PRESIDENT)
- CLARK MOSKOP (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHARLES LOHR (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to promote interest in acquiring, restoring and exhibiting antique or special interest vehicles. This includes participation in civic activities such as parades and displays. Also provides scholarships and does other charitable works such as veterans support and scholarships
What it reported doing in 2025
An annual "show" event is held at watson lake in prescott in the summer that attracts visitors from all over. The purpose is to interest people in antique and special purposes vehicles. Besides being within the primary purpose of the organization this show is also a fundraiser that supports this and other programs. The financial results of the show are reported on schedule g. There is no compensation paid to anyone for any of these activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.74; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 8% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.