Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
751910600
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
Phone
3256725601
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,084,115
Expenses
$880,669
Assets
$1,987,097
Liabilities
$21,893

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brady Harwell (Executive Director)
  • Steve Wegrzynowicz (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Debra Burchett (Exec Dir - Partial Year): $123,715 total reported compensation
  • Brady Harwell (Executive Director): $21,142 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Operate a charitable non-profit medical clinic providing affordable, high-quality medical care, prescription assistance, and related medical services to uninsured, low-income adults in the Abilene area.

What it reported doing in 2024

Medical Care Services: PMCM provided 3,859 primary care visits, including 364 new patient appointments, to uninsured adults in the Abilene area. Through ongoing access to affordable primary care, patients are able to establish a continuous relationship with a medical provider for preventive care, chronic disease management, and treatment of acute illnesses. These sevices help improve long-term health outcomes while reducing unnecessary reliance on hospital emergency departments for non-emergent medical needs. Patient fees represent only a small portion of the organizations operating revenue, allowing services to remain affordable while community support make comprehensive medical care and prescription assistance accessible to uninsured adults. Prescription Assistance Program: PMCM assisted 417 uninsured patients in obtaining 1,061 prescription medications through pharmaceutical assistance programs and other medication access resources.The estimated retail value of these medications exceeded $7.49 million, allowing patients with chronic medical conditions to receive life-sustaining treatements they otherwise could not afford. Program expenses leverage substantial donated pharmaceutical resources, significantly expanding the value of services provided to the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 96
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $721K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $178K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.