Prep4gold
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461996362
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Reston, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7033909435
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cancer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,127
- Expenses
- $142,727
- Assets
- $79,886
- Liabilities
- $2,675
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JONATHAN ERIC AGIN JD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN ERIC AGIN JD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $63,093 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build the next generation of prevention-sensitive care for children with cancer and their families. Through a focus on prevention, research, education, and programs (prep), prep4gold works to improve every part of the cancer ...continued on schedule ocontinued from page 2... Journey -- from reducing risk to advancing treatments, finding cures, and supporting survivors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Prep4gold strives to establish the next generation of prevention-sensitive care -supporting prevention, research, education and programs - for children with cancer and their families in four key areas: environment, treatment, cure, and survivorship. Prep4gold takes a 360-degree, prevention-sensitive approach to prepare the next generation of care for children fighting cancer, one that strives for our children to thrive, not just survive! Prevention: central to our philosophy is the concept of prevention in every aspect of childhood cancer. Prevention in its true form includes avoiding children from developing cancer altogether, lessening the financial burdens from the diagnosis, ...continued on schedule ocontinued from page 2... Precluding the complex of harms that impact survivors as a result of treatment as well as environmental concerns throughout their entire lives, and protecting the psycho-social impact upon children and the family. We strive to apply the concept of prevention in a 360-degree strategy to address the most pressing issues faced by children and families as a result of the diagnosis.research: prep4gold's approach to childhood cancer research can be summed up in one word: impact. With limited yet precious resources, we seek to identify forward-thinking aggressive research efforts aimed at moving the needle ahead. With the aim to reduce duplicative funding, organizationally our goal is outcome driven rather than incrementally focused.education: more than raising awareness, it is empowering people with information, making effective change possible. Parental education is needed to further ease the impact of treatment and survivorship on their children, themselves as care providers, and their families. It also provides confidence to families of underserved populations that treatment is possible and outlines how to acquire vital care to save their children. Education is imperative for our childhood cancer experts to expand the spectrum of care to include psychosocial support and financial counseling for families to successfully manage medical expenses. Educating professionals outside the childhood cancer community on core competencies increases the workforce who can provide customized care to our children in treatment, our survivors, and their families.programs: provide the remedy and solutions to the many challenges experienced by children and their families impacted by childhood cancer. Through a team-spirited approach collaborating with like-minded colleagues, prep4gold strives to design programs born in the laboratory, clinic, legislature and by families themselves. It takes innovative programming to improve the landscape of childhood cancer and survivorship, and provide a life of quality for our children.major accomplishments for 2024: following the success of the historic inaugural childhood cancer prevention symposium convened in 2023, significant time was spent during 2024 engaging numerous childhood cancer organizations to maintain momentum from the first symposium. This involved planning for the 2nd childhood cancer prevention symposium held at Texas children's in february 2025. In addition, we began putting together the constructs for what will be known as the childhood cancer prevention consortium. This consortium will consist of partners collaborating, convening a world class scientific advisory council, and identifying and outlining a comprehensive childhood cancer prevention strategy. Significant time and effort were spent on creating the outline and framework for the consortium, putting together the agenda and presentations for the symposium, which was scheduled for three full days, and engaging with the scientific and clinical community to better understand the obstructions to childhood cancer prevention. Large amounts of time were spent in identifying, outlining, and building structural components of prep4gold's prevention mission.in addition, prep4gold, through its executive director, attended v
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 66.2%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.6%; rating input score 86; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 44.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 66.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.