Pregnancy Resources & Medical Clinic of North Tx
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752199472
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burleson, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8172954101
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Planning Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,417,902
- Expenses
- $1,480,033
- Assets
- $1,346,284
- Liabilities
- $710,240
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANDRA TUCKER (President)
Highest reported compensation
- SUMMER GARCIA (Executive Dir.): $88,925 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Next Step Womens Centers mission is to affirm life by providing spiritual, emotional, educational, and material support in a non-judgmental environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Client Services-In 2024, we had 2379 client visits. All services are provided free of charge and include consultation with the client regarding available pregnancy options, healthy sexual relationships, STI health risks and abstinence information. An abortion recovery program is offered to women to find a path of healing after an abortion. We also offer Soul Care coaching and mentoring for those who are seeking spiritual guidance. The value of services and material goods donated to the community in 2024 is $380,195.52Medical-All medical services are provided free of charge and performed under the license of a local, board-certified OB/GYN. In 2024, pregnancy tests were provided to 949 clients. Sonograms were performed on 565 clients to confirm intra-uterine pregnancy, fetal heart beat and expected delivery date. Prenatal vitamins were provided to 694 clients and 300 STI Tests. During 2024, the value of medical services and material goods provided to the community totaled $251,619.12Educational Services-During 2024, prenatal and parenting education was provided to 333 clients, totaling6973 client visits. All classes are provided at no charge and are designed to equipclients with knowledge, practical skills, and emotional support as they progress throughtheir pregnancy and parenting journey. The value of these programs and material goodsprovided in 2024 was $311,552.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.