Pregnancy Resource Center of the New River Valley Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521404868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Blacksburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5405525556
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $963,258
- Expenses
- $892,741
- Assets
- $1,387,458
- Liabilities
- $29,447
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Larissa Richards (CEO)
- Debbie Christian (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Larissa Richards (CEO): $66,571 total reported compensation
- Debbie Christian (CEO): $6,976 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with physical emotional economic and social issues associated with pregnancy. Providing medical services to confirm pregnancy and for sexual health. Counseling women and men in pregnancy options pregnancy loss and sexual risk avoidance.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical Services Counseling and Education - Our medical services include pregnancy testing limited obstetrical ultrasound distributing prenatal vitamins limited STI testing and treatment and expanded testing for UTI Yeast and Vaginosis and treatment. Our counseling services include pregnancy options and pregnancy loss support. We strive to provide the first steps of care when a woman thinks she might be pregnant. We also provide pregnancy verification and medical referrals so that a woman can being prenatal care as soon as possible. All of our services are free and confidential. We provide limited STI testing for women and men treatment for those that test positive along with information on STIs and sexual risk avoidance. Through our education services we provide pregnancy and parenting up to toddler age education programs for women and men who choose to parent or already are parents including life skills classes and meeting with our parent mentors. We provide material items for individuals participating in our education program. In 2024 a total of 769 distinct clients were served with 82 participants and support persons in our education program. We administered 380 pregnancy tests 235 ultrasounds 572 STI and expanded health tests 126 treatments for positive test results and 685 education lessons viewed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $684K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.