Pregnancy Resource Center Dba Pathway Health Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330809605
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Vista, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7609454673
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $762,475
- Expenses
- $729,102
- Assets
- $684,143
- Liabilities
- $11,931
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LESLIE SALAZAR-CARRILLO (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LESLIE SALAZAR-CARRILLO (CEO): $88,344 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pathway health clinic provides evidence-based medical services and education in the area of sexual health.
What it reported doing in 2025
Licensed Medical Services: Our licensed medical professionals provided comprehensive services to support womens health in 2025. This included 260 pregnancy tests and 144 ultrasounds. Out of the women served, 140 chose to parent their children, with 40 of them identified as abortion vulnerable. Additionally, our medical team provided prenatal vitamins and educational materials on healthy pregnancy to patients who requested assistance.STD Testing and Well-Woman Exams: Pathway Health Clinics STD Testing and Treatment Program and Well-Woman Exams play a vital role in supporting women at all stages of life. In 2025, we conducted 101 STD tests and provided appropriate treatments as needed, alongside education on disease prevention. Additionally, 35 women received Well-Woman exams. Our medical team, comprising a staff physician assistant, a volunteer naturopathic doctor, and a nurse practitioner, collaborated to provide holistic care to women in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 64.8%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.6% of revenue deployed · 64.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $473K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.