Pregnancy Choices Clinic

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942825322
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Union City, CA, USA
Phone
5104874357
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Pregnancy Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$189,294
Expenses
$246,931
Assets
$105,215
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DIANA GRAHAM (CHAIRMAN)
  • EDWARD CRABLE (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DAVID FONG (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's specific purpose is to help families in a state of crisis regarding unplanned pregnancy and ensuring the most advantageous outcome for the parents and the child. Providing all available alterntives in making an educated decision on how to proceed and providing resources for assistance. For the woman who decides to carry her baby to term, the center will provide emergency aid in whatever form is available.

What it reported doing in 2014

Raised funds and donations are used to offer pregnancy tests, maternity and baby clothes, prenatal and infant care, referrals to community resources and agencies. We serve a vital need in our community and have seen over 1200 clients this year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 60.2%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -43% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 60.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $149K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.