Pregnancy Center of the Illinois Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931029928
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Cave Junction, OR, USA
Phone
5415926058
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hot Line, Crisis Intervention Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,456
Expenses
$41,724
Assets
$26,214

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LENORA SWIFT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NATASHA REED (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SHARON TALBOT (BOARD CHAIR / SECY)
  • JUDY CLIPP (BOARD MEMBER)
  • LENORA SWIFT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the pregnancy center of the Illinois valley is to provide education, godly guidance, life affirming programs, services, and loving encouragement to those who may be pregnant, parenting, or post-abortive.

What it reported doing in 2021

Parenting & pregnancy education: approximately 43 1-on-1 mentoring and 30 group meetings were provided. These appointments are specific to each parent and can include topics regarding parenting, pregnancy, labor & delivery, breastfeeding, spiritual discipleship, life skills, and relationship skills. After each session, the parent(s) earn a shopping trip through our resource market for baby supplies. We also refer the parent(s) to other local resource providers as needed. An additional 62 phone calls and/or texts were made to provide education and lessons during several long periods of shutdowns that plagued us this last fiscal year. Approximately 82 people served.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 48.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.