Pregnancy Care Center of Cayuga County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261597515
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Auburn, NY, USA
Phone
3152552778
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Pregnancy Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$150,388
Expenses
$119,030
Assets
$181,070

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LYNN GREENE (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • PATSY HUDSON (BOARD VICE-C)
  • RYAN LYNDAKER (BOARD CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The pregnancy care center of cayuga county, inc. Provides practical, emotional and spiritual support to women, men and children who are facing pregnancy and abortion related concerns by sharing the gospel of jesus christ as well as be a resource for information on available community services such as free pregnancy and peer counseling services, pregnancy, abortion alternative, post-abortion support and abstinence programs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided free pregnancy tests, peer counseling, information about std's, and abortion procedures, risks and alternatives. Also provided "earn while you learn" parent training programs and post-abortion bible studies, and baby supplies and diapers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.2%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.52; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.2% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.