Preferred Family Healthcare
Legal name: Preferred Family Healthcare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431236557
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Kirksville, MO, USA
- Phone
- 314-535-2310
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $127,987,180
- Expenses
- $129,513,868
- Assets
- $136,472,138
- Liabilities
- $34,716,168
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CJ DAVIS (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- MICHAEL SCHWEND (PRESIDENT AND CEO - PFH)
Highest reported compensation
- CJ DAVIS (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $1,276,961 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL SCHWEND (PRESIDENT AND CEO - PFH): $1,017,877 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER GAGNON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $622,275 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preferred Family Healthcare is here for you with compassionate experts, affordable care and locations convenient to you. Start the next step in your journey towards overall health and wellness today.
What it reported doing in 2024
Preferred family healthcare (pfh) offers mental health treatment programs for youth and adults suffering from a serious emotional disturbance or serious and persistent mental illness. Pfh is able to serve individuals who experience difficulty accessing services due to being uninsured. Additionally, pfh operates a vast network of outpatient clinics providing treatment in over 150 schools. Pfh has been at the forefront of designing interventions that have progressively allowed for more and more clients to maintain independence and mental wellness. Such interventions include health home engagement: pfh participates in the health home initiative in Oklahoma and Missouri providing care coordination to individuals whose mental illness and physical health symptoms identify the high-risk. Pfh continues to implement innovative practices across our four state service area. This is evidenced by numerous federal and foundation grant awards which allow pfh the ability to pilot what have turned out to be highly successful integrated care efforts. Such initiatives include: specialized sud treatment services for pregnant and postpartum women, certified community-based health center services, assertive community treatment for transitional aged youth, expanded medication-assisted treatment (mat), and numerous other programs which assist in coordinating primary & behavioral health care for individual with comorbidities. Youth and family - preferred family healthcare (pfh) supports children, youth, and families with complex needs, including: children and youth who are at risk of being removed from home or who have been removed with the goal of reunification; children and youth with serious emotional, neurobiological or behavioral disturbance, and their families; and children and youth having problems that place the children or youth at risk. Pfh is also the proud recipient of three federal regional partnership grants (funded by the children's bureau, administration for children, youth & families) which are aimed at impacting child welfare and parental substance use concurrently. This funding has allowed pfh to formalize the creation of a multidisciplinary team (child welfare, treatment, and employment) which generates significant cost savings for the state of Missouri. Domestic violence - preferred family healthcare (pfh) has provided domestic violence (dv) victim services since 1979 and sexual assault (sa) victim services since 2001 in the greater st. Louis metropolitan region. Dv & sa services provided at pfh include a 24-hour crisis hotline and intervention, emergency shelter, individual and group counseling outreach, emergency response teams, and community education. In order to provide effective services, pfh's dv advocates have established reciprocal relationships with state and local organizations including Missouri department of public safety, department of social services, department of health and senior services, local police departments, prosecuting attorneys' offices, hospitals, and community service agencies. Collaborative efforts are the crux of the organization, ensuring each individual served is offered the utmost in care and support. Through collaborations in the community, advocates are able to provide wraparound services for client needs that may otherwise go unmet. Pfh continuously provides community education and training to promote awareness on issues that victims of dv & sa face and to teach other helping professionals how to handle disclosure of victimization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 85% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 51.4%; rating input score 51; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 85.4% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $109.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 24 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 23 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 51/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.