Preble County Pork Festival Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237128985
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Eaton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9374567273
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,914
- Expenses
- $75,549
- Assets
- $682,956
- Liabilities
- $4,159
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ZACHARY SHAFER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LISA TUTTLE- HUFF (VICE-PRESIDE)
- MEGAN LUTZ (TREASURER)
- SUSAN SHAFER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A.) to promote pork production and consumption. B.)to promote agricultural interest essential to and a part of pork production. C.)to be a corporation organized exclusively for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes as related to items a.) and b.) listed above. Proceeds from the festival have been used exclusively for improvements to the preble county fairgrounds.
What it reported doing in 2024
The planning and operation of a festival that encourages agricultural interest in the production and consumption of pork
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 24
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.4%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 11
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -144.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.04; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.4% of revenue deployed · 11.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.