Praise Chapel Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593495663
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Deland, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9049433786
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,236
- Expenses
- $124,259
- Assets
- $59,599
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- PASTOR LOUIS PRATILE (PASTOR): $48,100 total reported compensation
- GAIL PRATILE (SECRETARY): $14,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preparing the body of christ to have a passion for jesus, compassion for others and a heart to serve preaching anf teaching the word of god. Souls saved, lives changed.
What it reported doing in 2018
Outreach program; minister to the community for those in need & direct them to the path of christ. Feed the hungry food pantry feeding the needy, support mission needs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 50.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.