Ppeforhcp Limited
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851818722
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4259613003
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Safety, Disaster Preparedness & Relief N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $200
- Expenses
- $120
- Assets
- $1,280
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sophia Boettcher (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Sophia Boettcher (Executive Director)
- Anthony Watts (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to support healthcare providers underserved communities by sourcing, receiving, and distributing personal protective equipment (PPE) and related supplies for free. The organization focuses on ensuring access to essential protective resources, particularly during periods of supply constraint or emergency need and operates with minimal overhead by leveraging in-kind donations.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization received and maintained in-kind donation software personal protective equipment (PPE) and managed the distribution and available of these supplies for charitable purposes (communities in underserved areas, rare disease patients from marginalized backgrounds). Activities included sourcing donated supplies (surplus), maintaining inventory, and supporting access / requests for PPE for healthcare-related use. The organization operated with extremely low overhead, with expenses primarily from communications and internet to coordinate operations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.67; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $120 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.