Powermentor
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330883809
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Chula Vista, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8887087742
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Government and Public Administration
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,552
- Expenses
- $64,655
- Assets
- $15,690
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jose Orozco (President/CEO)
People named in this filing
- Jose Orozco (President/CEO)
- Rosselen Banuelos (CFO)
- Jimmy Rodriguez (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Develop leaders one person at a time
What it reported doing in 2025
Led sustained international advocacy efforts to raise awareness of humanitarian and human rights conditions affecting the Karen people, located along the Thailand-Burma (Myanmar) border region. Organized and participated in a Washington, DC Advocacy Day, engaging directly with U.S. Department of State and congressional offices and legislative staff. Provided informed briefings centered on civilian protection, humanitarian access, and long-term stability and self-governance aspirations. Strengthened relationships with policymakers to ensure Karen perspectives are accurately understood and responsibly considered. Deployed and supported rapid response teams along the Thailand-Burma (Myanmar) border region. Delivered emergency medical care to internally displaced persons (IDPs), including primary and urgent care. Coordinated food distribution and essential supplies for displaced families affected by ongoing instability. Accomplished the programs through trusted local partners to ensure timely, culturally appropriate, and needs-based assistance.Facilitated structured engagement to understand Karen community priorities related to safety and protection, education and healthcare, future aspirations and community well-being. Used community-informed input to guide advocacy, humanitarian response, and public education. Ensured Karen voices were represented respectfully and accurately, without imposing external narratives.Continued documentation of Karen history, displacement experiences, and leadership evolution. Preserved accurate context to support long-term understanding, education, and peace-building efforts. Contributed to institutional memory that informs future generations and external partners.Supported faith-based encouragement aligned with Karen values and traditions. Reinforced dignity-centered approaches that emphasize family, service, and mutual care. Maintained cultural respect without reducing identity to symbols or stereotypes.Produced clear, accessible materials to help global audiences understand the Karen situation. Translated complex regional dynamics into balanced, factual narratives for supporters, partners, and policymakers. Maintained respectful, informative messaging focused on learning and understanding.Provided regular insight through the PowerMentor blog on countries living under totalitarian or authoritarian systems that are seeking pathways toward freedom, dignity, and democratic participation. Used these analyses as educational tools for young people, helping them learn how to research credible sources, how to compare global political and humanitarian contexts, and how to think critically without ideological pressure. Created space for global peer learning, encouraging youth from different countries to learn from each others experiences, share perspectives responsibly, and build informed global awareness rooted in empathy and facts. Positioned education as a bridge between communities, reinforcing the belief that knowledge, dialogue, and shared learning strengthen future leadership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.4% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $62K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.