Powerca Action Fka Mobilize the Immigrant Vote Action

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454091853
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
5106983828
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,461,408
Expenses
$1,515,948
Assets
$1,163,239
Liabilities
$170,587

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUIS SANCHEZ (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LUIS SANCHEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGELICA SALAS (BOARD CHAIR)
  • PRASI GUPTA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our purpose is to advance a progressive agenda for justice and equity for all californians by engaging, mobilizing and building the leadership of young voters of color and their families by passing progressive legislation and to a lesser degree, candidate elections.

What it reported doing in 2024

See schedule opolicy: powerca action sponsored four bills, with two bills (the security deposits and voter pre-registration bills) currently advancing. We engaged with 25 legislative aides from 20 offices, negotiated bill language for the security deposits bill, launched a power advocates program training 10 youth leaders, three of whom joined senator butler's youth council, and had four members provide expert testimony on three bills at the capitol.membership and organizing program: we engaged and mobilized over 1,000 powerca action members and contacted more than 75,000 young voters for the 2024 election.local campaigns: powerca action has hired over 20 canvass team leads and canvassers for central valley voter contact campaigns.narrative: we implemented an earned media strategy to train youth spokespeople and generate more than 20 media hits to shape the narrative around young voters. Powerca action developed and distributed a youth-focused voter guide to over 175,000 young bipoc voters, engaging more than 500,000 young voters across our digital channels. Primary field alliance campaign: powerca action builds the capacity of over 10 alliance partners, helping them hire staff and run statewide voter contact campaigns. Powerca action trained more than 100 canvass team leads and canvassers for statewide efforts to pass a statewide housing initiative and defeat a measure that would overturn criminal justice reforms in California.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.7%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $82.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.7% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 19 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.