The Power of Sight Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874509925
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Panorama City, CA, US
Phone
661-450-8476
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,342
Expenses
$103,171
Assets
$55,699
Liabilities
$57,004

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GIANNY CARDENAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDE)
  • ADRIANA CARDENAS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GIANNY CARDENAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDE)
  • ADRIANA CARDENAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA PLASCENCIA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improving Vision, Changing Lives

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide eye care clinics to churches, christian institutions and organizations in order to fund and provide the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of vision loss and other vision issues; increase public awareness of importance of eye health; and increase availability and treatments of vision loss and other vision issues in underprivileged communities of need in order that all might see that jesus christ can cure the blind and restore the sight to the sightless.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 55.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 93.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.