Power Is Giving Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475592642
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,629
Expenses
$40,380
Assets
$2,134

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dawn Hilton-Williams (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Dawn Hilton-Williams (Executive Director)
  • Colletta Bryce (Board Co-Chair)
  • Montez Alford (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Delivering culturally aligned whole food plant-based lifestyle education to equip disproportionately impacted communities with tools that support the prevention arrest and reversal of lifestyle-driven chronic illness.

What it reported doing in 2025

Suggested Part III Program Service Accomplishment for EDD Roots 2025 In 2025 Power Is Giving advanced its EDD Roots program through a special Vegan Holiday Food Drive activation in Charlotte. Partnering with Oh My Soul vegan restaurant and Care Ring we mobilized community members to donate over 200 pounds of culturally aligned whole food plant-based staples filling three 66-liter bins and multiple bags for Care Rings pantry. This initiative expanded access to foods that support the prevention arrest and reversal of lifestyle-driven chronic illness modeled equity-centered year-end giving and strengthened community collaboration around wellness and nutrition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.1%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 38.3%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -102.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 82.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.1% of revenue deployed · 38.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.