Poway Dance Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 264819702
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
Location: Poway, CA, USA
Rating: 87
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue: $183,813
Expenses: $172,892
Assets: $46,810

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

DANIELLE KNIGHTEN (President)

People named in this filing

HILDA WARD (VP WAYS & MEANS)
DANIELLE KNIGHTEN (President)
TIFFANY DAVIS (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote dance at poway high school by assisting each eligible student to pursue excellence in high school extra curricular activities by providing financial and administrative support not otherwise provided by the school district for the dance program.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided administrative support to the poway high school dance program by coordinating the aquisition of team apparel, arrangement and payment for summer dance camp, arrangement and payment of choreography services, arrangement and payment of team competition costs and other support activities.

Operating model

Revenue model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 96
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 38
Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $173K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.