Pou Timoun Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474559510
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Studio City, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3104993920
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $156,381
- Expenses
- $131,625
- Assets
- $24,785
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cara Rich (CEO)
- Julie James (President)
People named in this filing
- Corrie Mc Arthur (Secretary)
- Cara Rich (CEO)
- Daniel Cutforth (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of this corporation is to support vulnerable children (from infants to teenagers) living in and aging out of orphanages in Haiti, in the areas of education, medical care and nutrition. It will also support initiatives that strive to provide economic stability to Haitian families so that fewer children are relinquished to orphanages due to the effects of extreme poverty.
What it reported doing in 2018
Through our fundraising activities we are able to provide cash grants to the Haitian American Caucus -Haiti a 501 (c)(3) organization that closely aligns with our organizations mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -195.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 139.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 199.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 0.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $548 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.