Post Antelope Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611606765
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Post, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8067973251
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,080
- Expenses
- $44,464
- Assets
- $74,300
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANA COOPER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NEIL EASTER (President)
People named in this filing
- SHANA COOPER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TAIT CROW (TREASURER)
- NEIL EASTER (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Post antelope booster club's mission is to provide positive support, assistance and encouragement to the student athletes and athletic programs of post high school of post independent school district, by improving and sustaining the spirit, fellowship and knowledge among its member and the community in a cooperative and enthusiastic manner.post antelope booster club supports, promotes and advances student participation in athletics at post high school district, by organizing, sponsoring and implementing club supported activities and events and in the sole discretion of the corporation, provide funds for expenses and or expenditures in support of the student athletic programs at post high school.the sports teams are funded to a certain extent by the school, however many needs are not met by that funding. We help to acquire items not budgeted for at the school level. Throughout the year post antelope booster club hosts various fundraisers including, but not limited to, bake sales, conces
What it reported doing in 2020
Post antelope booster club's mission is to provide positive support, assistance and encouragement to the student athletes and athletic programs of post high school of post independent school district, by improving and sustaining the spirit, fellowship and knowledge among its member and the community in a cooperative and enthusiastic manner.post antelope booster club supports, promotes and advances student participation in athletics at post high school district, by organizing, sponsoring and implementing club supported activities and events and in the sole discretion of the corporation, provide funds for expenses and or expenditures in support of the student athletic programs at post high school.the sports teams are funded to a certain extent by the school, however many needs are not met by that funding. We help to acquire items not budgeted for at the school level. Throughout the year post antelope booster club hosts various fundraisers including, but not limited to, bake sales, concession stands, t-shirt sales, and other merchandise sales. We also solicit for donations from individuals, organizations, and local businesses. We support all sports programs at the high school each year. Coaches put together a wish list and the booster club then decides what wishes they will fulfill that year. We provide items like balls, pitching machines, kicking nets, helmets, and other sporting supplies as needed by the teams. Items are bought directly and given to the school sports programs appropriately.our program is marketed through various methods including newspaper ads, social media, radio ads, fliers, pamphlets, word of mouth and possibly a developing website. In the future we plan to implement a scholarship program for individuals who attend the high school we sponsor who would like to pursue sports at institutions of higher learning
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -50.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.