Positive Behavior Support Community Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371649441
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Greenlawn, NY, USA
Phone
6313064323
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,215
Expenses
$139,563
Assets
$81,813
Liabilities
$224

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAN ELFAWAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN INNIS (CHAIR)
  • DAN ELFAWAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DIANE MC COLEMAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation will provide help for people with autism spectrum disorders and other developmental disabilities, focusing on self determination and full inclusion in the community. As of 1/1/2021, the organization is doing business as positive community connections, inc. The former name for the organization is positive behavior support community foundation, inc.

What it reported doing in 2025

Various social and recreational events for individuals with disabilities who are maintaining self-determined funding plans. There was a continued increase in participation in our most popular initiatives including big time glee, crafting connection, and mid-week meetups in suffolk. We continue to expand these programs for nassau county, and broaden our reach through social media and website developments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -39.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.2%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.