Portage Path Behavioral Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341096055
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Akron, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3302533100
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Association
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,365,224
- Expenses
- $16,817,089
- Assets
- $6,615,306
- Liabilities
- $2,615,888
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRACY YAEGER PHD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GABRIELA FEIER MD (MD): $393,589 total reported compensation
- RAMAN KRIMPURI (VP/MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $305,265 total reported compensation
- MANZOOR ELAHI MD (MD): $301,622 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The agency provides mental health services for adults in summit county, Ohio. The agency helps adults work through and cope with behavioral and emotional problems using therapy, group programs, and medication when necessary.
What it reported doing in 2024
Outpatient treatment includes the following services: diagnostic assessment: conducted to provide the information to identify patient clinical need, functioning level, formulate initial and ongoing services, treatment approaches, formulate a diagnostic impression, identify problems that may be impairing progress in treatment, and implement appropriate patient referrals.group counseling: designed to treat the patients' mental illness and emotional problems by a trained clinician to facilitate and guide a group of 3 or more members who react to each other on a cognitive level for the purpose of increasing the patients' functional level, increasing the functional effectiveness of behavior, enhancing relationship skills, and promoting positive personality growth.individual counseling: professional staff utilize a variety of treatment modalities/approaches designed to provide patients with maximum treatment benefit. Psychotherapy is individualized and interventions are designed to benefit each patient and frequency of sessions is based on presenting manifestations of ongoing behavior. Pharmacologic management: after psychiatric evaluation by a psychiatrist or aprn bc (advance practice registered nurse with prescribing licensure) it will be determined if medication is prescribed and how often and over what period of time medication/somatic appointments will be scheduled.day treatment: designed to provide comprehensive, intensive, flexible, structured, goaloriented, facetoface treatment services to patients who are experiencing an acute period of difficulty in functioning, problems coping with life stress, exacerbation of emotional problems, and unstable medication management.community psychiatric supportive treatment (cpst): provides an array of services delivered by community based, mobile individuals. Services address the individualized mental health needs of the client. Cpst professionals will maintain ongoing assessment of client needs and assistance in achieving personal independence in managing basic needs as identified by the individual and/or guardian. 60,768 services provided to 7,884 distinct clients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $394K · 19 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.