Pop Warner Little Scholars Inc Auburn Pop Warner

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043237792
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Auburn, MA, USA
Phone
5087690595
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Football

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,564
Expenses
$20,735
Assets
$11,801

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • COREY J HANDFIELD (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL HAMMOND (VICE-PRESIDENT FOOTBALL OPERATIONS)
  • KRISTIN DIGUETTE (VICE-PRESIDENT CHEERLEADING OPERATIONS)

People named in this filing

  • COREY J HANDFIELD (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY J HANDFIELD (TREASURER)
  • MICHAEL HAMMOND (VICE-PRESIDENT FOOTBALL OPERATIONS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To teach the basic skills and concepts of football and cheerleading.

What it reported doing in 2013

Football and cheerleading activities

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.