Pop Warner Little Scholars Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990349983
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Waimanalo, HI, USA
Phone
8082597050
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Football

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,920
Expenses
$7,920
Assets
$781

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Waimanalo Football Club is to coordinate the administration, operation of the Conference, to comply with the By-Laws and requirements of Oahu Pop Warner District Federation, Inc., and the National Pop Warner Little Scholars, Inc. To inspire youth, regardless of race, color or national origin, to practice the ideals of sportsmanship and physical fitness.

What it reported doing in 2012

Provided 7 coaches with mandatory coaches clinics and CPR/1st Aid training as required by Oahu Pop Warner District Federation, Inc. so they can provide their players with coaches who will teach them the skills they need to become scholar athletes. we also ran background checks on coaches for the safety of the players. Also cleaned up football field for players before the start of the season

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.