Pont Global Medicine Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331640366
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,415
- Expenses
- $37,078
- Assets
- $101,323
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Trammell Jones (President)
- Priscilla Biney (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Trammell Jones (President)
- Priscilla Biney (Vice President)
- Tim Bentsen (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bridge doctors and patients worldwide through the power of technology.
What it reported doing in 2025
Program Name: Wellington Telemedicine Clinic | Location: Wellington Freetown Sierra Leone | Narrative: In 2025 our organization significantly expanded its mission to provide high-quality accessible healthcare in Freetown Sierra Leone. We focused on three primary pillars: Direct Patient Care Infrastructure Support and Patient Assistance and Medical Supplies. | 1. Direct Patient Care: Beginning in February volunteer physicians regularly saw patients at a community health clinic in the Wellington neighborhood of Freetown Sierra Leone. 9 attending physicians from the United States and United Kingdom regularly logged in and saw patients via telemedicine. We hired on the ground nurses and community health workers to assist the physicians in caring for patients. Their salaries totaled $3111. Mostly in the second half of 2025 our clinic supported over 900 physician consultations in pediatrics and internal medicine. | 2. Infrastructure Support: Given the unstable local power grid poor internet connectivity and unreliable paper record keeping we invested $8,286 in infrastructure improvements. We installed solar power at the clinic and established high speed Starlink internet. We launched a cloud-based electronic medical records system for reliable record keeping for our nurses and doctors. All of this provided the foundation for seamless video consultations for our patients. | 3. Patient Assistance and Medical Supplies: Given that the clinic is based in a historically impoverished area of Freetown we launched several initiatives. First we established a free pharmacy of essential medications for telemedicine patients. Second we created a financial assistance process to pay for surgeries hospitalizations and specialty physician referrals for our patients. Third we improved the diagnostics of the free laboratory at the clinic. These expenses totaled $6,359. | Impact Statement: Through the combination of professional physician volunteerism and technological innovation we have moved beyond temporary aid toward a sustainable data-driven healthcare model for some of the poorest patients in the world.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.1%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 47.9%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 70.7%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.73; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.1% of revenue deployed · 47.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.