Pones Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770710862
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Highland Heights, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5133197764
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,149
- Expenses
- $131,672
- Assets
- $138,999
- Liabilities
- $187
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY POPA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & EX OFFICIO BOARD DIRECTOR)
- WHITNEY MAXSON (BOARD PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY POPA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & EX OFFICIO BOARD DIRECTOR)
- WHITNEY MAXSON (BOARD PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
- JOSHUA NEUMEYER (BOARD TREASURER AND DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charitable & Educational (arts/education programming)
What it reported doing in 2024
PRODUCTION: Full productions in the theatre/dance genre which provide entertainment and education while creating a sense of community and connection among audience members. 2024-25 impact included 14 projects involving 85 contributing artists, with a total of 3,151 attendees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.5%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 61.2%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.5% of revenue deployed · 61.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.