Pond Cove Parents Association Co Claire Joyce

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272024925
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cape Elizabeth, ME, USA
Phone
2077997339
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,223
Expenses
$21,126
Assets
$96,115

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Katie Swayze (President)
  • Elli Carter (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Katie Swayze (President)
  • Elli Carter (Vice President)
  • Jennifer Grymek (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To Enrich, Support and Enhance the Social and Learning Environment of Pond Cove Students.

What it reported doing in 2024

The PCPA continues to enhance school programs through our two largest annual fundraisers, Harvest Fest and Cape Challenge 5k, volunteer support, student field trips, visiting artists, and teacher appreciation efforts, while also promoting strong partnerships between families and the school community. In addition to our fundraisers, we offered two community events, a game night for families & a community and culture night where we came together to eat delicious foods from all over, prepared by students and families. After much consideration, we finally made the switch from Scholastic Books to partner with a local bookstore for book fairs this year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 11
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.6%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.55; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.6% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.