Pomerene Health Foundation Llc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475317369
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Millersburg, OH, USA
Phone
3306741015
Rating
28
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,297
Expenses
$95,095
Assets
$2,263,376
Liabilities
$354

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON JUSTUS (CHAIR/PRESIDENT)
  • TIA CERNAVA (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JASON JUSTUS (CHAIR/PRESIDENT): $403,434 total reported compensation
  • TIA CERNAVA (VICE PRESIDENT): $249,103 total reported compensation
  • TRACY SMITH (SECRETARY): $124,197 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The pomerene health foundation will manage and coordinate fundraising campaigns, deferred-giving programs, and similar activities designed for the financial and volunteer support of the hospital. In addition, the foundation will actively participate in consortia, preferred provider organizations and similar activities and develop innovative healthcare delivery strategies in which to participate on behalf of the hospital.

What it reported doing in 2024

The pomerene health foundation provides support to the holmes county community and pomerene hospital by offering healthcare scholarships for local residents, an emergency medication fund to patients in need, and special hospital requests for equipment and supplies that may arise.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The strongest available result is that the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.9%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 4
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.8; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.9% of revenue deployed · 4.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $403K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.